https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113052 A claim for exemption under Notification No. 65/88-Cus. in respect of Electromyography had not been examined by the original authority, so the matter required fresh adjudication at that stage in accordance with law and natural justice. By contrast, the customs duty demand relating to the Probe for Ultra Sound Scanner, where the challenge was not separately pursued on the relevant ground and the exemption had already been denied under Notification No. 64/88-Cus., was sustained. en-us Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2012 15:20:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113052 A claim for exemption under Notification No. 65/88-Cus. in respect of Electromyography had not been examined by the original authority, so the matter required fresh adjudication at that stage in accordance with law and natural justice. By contrast, the customs duty demand relating to the Probe for Ultra Sound Scanner, where the challenge was not separately pursued on the relevant ground and the exemption had already been denied under Notification No. 64/88-Cus., was sustained. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113052