<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113041</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s order directing the transmission of shares to the respondent, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions, protection of interests, and adherence to due process through public notice and indemnity bond requirements. The appeal challenging the order was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113041</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s order directing the transmission of shares to the respondent, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions, protection of interests, and adherence to due process through public notice and indemnity bond requirements. The appeal challenging the order was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>