<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 428 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113032</link>
    <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement in the nature of amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between Mekaster Valves &amp;amp; Engineering Services Private Limited and Mekaster Engineering &amp;amp; Equipments Private Limited. The Court approved the amalgamation, emphasizing synergic advantages, operational synchronization, resource utilization, cost reduction, and improved profits. Compliance with relevant provisions, objections raised by the Central Government, and the principle of Single Window Clearance were addressed, leading to the approval of the Scheme by shareholders. The Court granted the petition, sanctioning the Scheme with all its clauses and proposals, and awarded costs to the Assistant Solicitor General of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 428 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113032</link>
      <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement in the nature of amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between Mekaster Valves &amp;amp; Engineering Services Private Limited and Mekaster Engineering &amp;amp; Equipments Private Limited. The Court approved the amalgamation, emphasizing synergic advantages, operational synchronization, resource utilization, cost reduction, and improved profits. Compliance with relevant provisions, objections raised by the Central Government, and the principle of Single Window Clearance were addressed, leading to the approval of the Scheme by shareholders. The Court granted the petition, sanctioning the Scheme with all its clauses and proposals, and awarded costs to the Assistant Solicitor General of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>