<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 443 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113028</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, partially allowed the appeal by reducing the redemption fine from 100% to 45% and the penalty from 10% to 5% of the determined values imposed by the Commissioner of Customs Central Excise, Goa, on the import of old and used diesel engines. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper justification and adherence to legal provisions in determining fines and penalties, highlighting the excessive nature of the initial imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 443 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113028</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, partially allowed the appeal by reducing the redemption fine from 100% to 45% and the penalty from 10% to 5% of the determined values imposed by the Commissioner of Customs Central Excise, Goa, on the import of old and used diesel engines. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper justification and adherence to legal provisions in determining fines and penalties, highlighting the excessive nature of the initial imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>