<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 638 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113008</link>
    <description>The court allowed Anand Saxena, Rohit Saxena, and Smt. Priti Srivastava to represent the deceased, Usha Saxena, ensuring continuity of legal proceedings. The judgment clarified steps for compliance with court orders post-demise and directed the Official Liquidator to vacate premises, subject to specified conditions, and transfer possession to Usha Saxena&#039;s legal representatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:28:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 638 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113008</link>
      <description>The court allowed Anand Saxena, Rohit Saxena, and Smt. Priti Srivastava to represent the deceased, Usha Saxena, ensuring continuity of legal proceedings. The judgment clarified steps for compliance with court orders post-demise and directed the Official Liquidator to vacate premises, subject to specified conditions, and transfer possession to Usha Saxena&#039;s legal representatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>