https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112994 The High Court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing that disputed questions of fact should be determined by the departmental authorities under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the petitioners should have sought relief through the appropriate authorities and declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. en-us Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2012 11:59:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112994 The High Court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing that disputed questions of fact should be determined by the departmental authorities under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the petitioners should have sought relief through the appropriate authorities and declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112994