https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112985 Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was refused where the applicants failed to show that duty stated on invoices issued by compounded levy manufacturers had actually been discharged, weakening the claim to deemed credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. The record also did not establish financial hardship sufficient for discretionary interim relief. As a result, complete waiver was declined and a pre-deposit direction was imposed, with stay relief to follow only on compliance. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2012 11:29:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112985 Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was refused where the applicants failed to show that duty stated on invoices issued by compounded levy manufacturers had actually been discharged, weakening the claim to deemed credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. The record also did not establish financial hardship sufficient for discretionary interim relief. As a result, complete waiver was declined and a pre-deposit direction was imposed, with stay relief to follow only on compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112985