<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 421 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 40,000 on the appellants after settling duty liability under the KVSS. While the duty liability was resolved through KVSS, the liability for redemption fine was deemed separate and not precluded by the settlement. The Tribunal reduced the fine from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 40,000 but affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) order in all other respects, finding no illegality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 421 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 40,000 on the appellants after settling duty liability under the KVSS. While the duty liability was resolved through KVSS, the liability for redemption fine was deemed separate and not precluded by the settlement. The Tribunal reduced the fine from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 40,000 but affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) order in all other respects, finding no illegality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>