<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 640 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112968</link>
    <description>Classification of the disputed item depended on whether it formed part of a transformer under Chapter Heading 85.04 or constituted electrical control/distribution equipment under Chapter Heading 85.37. The Tribunal noted that the earlier acceptance of transformer classification rested on expert confirmation in a different matter, but no expert opinion was available for the present item. It therefore held that the issue required fresh examination on expert evidence and after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The impugned classification order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 10:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 640 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112968</link>
      <description>Classification of the disputed item depended on whether it formed part of a transformer under Chapter Heading 85.04 or constituted electrical control/distribution equipment under Chapter Heading 85.37. The Tribunal noted that the earlier acceptance of transformer classification rested on expert confirmation in a different matter, but no expert opinion was available for the present item. It therefore held that the issue required fresh examination on expert evidence and after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The impugned classification order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>