<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 631 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112958</link>
    <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where Modvat credit had been taken on invoices issued by a dealer who was required to obtain registration under Notification No. 32/94, but the record showed no knowledge by the assessee of the dealer&#039;s non-registration and no inducement or conduct suggesting participation in that default. The invoices had been issued before the registration due date and were valid when issued, so no wrongful act could be attributed to the assessee and the purchasers were treated as bona fide purchasers. The penal consequence was set aside, but the disallowance of Modvat credit remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:44:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 631 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112958</link>
      <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where Modvat credit had been taken on invoices issued by a dealer who was required to obtain registration under Notification No. 32/94, but the record showed no knowledge by the assessee of the dealer&#039;s non-registration and no inducement or conduct suggesting participation in that default. The invoices had been issued before the registration due date and were valid when issued, so no wrongful act could be attributed to the assessee and the purchasers were treated as bona fide purchasers. The penal consequence was set aside, but the disallowance of Modvat credit remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>