<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 627 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112954</link>
    <description>Where unaccounted goods are found but the assessee&#039;s clearances remain within the exemption threshold even after adding the excess quantity, non-accountal by itself does not establish intent to evade duty. The paper manufacturer continued to fall within the exemption limit under Notification No. 3/2001-C.E., and the disputed stock did not push clearances beyond that limit. On those facts, confiscation was not justified, while the reduced penalty was upheld because the record did not support an inference of evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 627 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112954</link>
      <description>Where unaccounted goods are found but the assessee&#039;s clearances remain within the exemption threshold even after adding the excess quantity, non-accountal by itself does not establish intent to evade duty. The paper manufacturer continued to fall within the exemption limit under Notification No. 3/2001-C.E., and the disputed stock did not push clearances beyond that limit. On those facts, confiscation was not justified, while the reduced penalty was upheld because the record did not support an inference of evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>