<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 618 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112945</link>
    <description>Credit of basic excise duty could be used to pay additional duties of excise where the Board circular was of general application. The Tribunal treated the circular as laying down a broader principle that credit of specified duties taken on inputs may be utilised for payment of any specified duty on the final products, and held that a reference to one notification did not confine the circular to that notification alone. It distinguished the Revenue&#039;s cited High Court decision as involving a circular meant for a specific situation, not one of general import. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and utilisation of credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 618 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112945</link>
      <description>Credit of basic excise duty could be used to pay additional duties of excise where the Board circular was of general application. The Tribunal treated the circular as laying down a broader principle that credit of specified duties taken on inputs may be utilised for payment of any specified duty on the final products, and held that a reference to one notification did not confine the circular to that notification alone. It distinguished the Revenue&#039;s cited High Court decision as involving a circular meant for a specific situation, not one of general import. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and utilisation of credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>