<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 606 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the company and its Managing Director, setting aside the impugned order. The duty demand on processed fabrics was deemed unsustainable, and penalties and confiscation were found unjustified. The Tribunal clarified that no duty was applicable to grey fabric and emphasized the prospective application of statutory provisions, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:53:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 606 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the company and its Managing Director, setting aside the impugned order. The duty demand on processed fabrics was deemed unsustainable, and penalties and confiscation were found unjustified. The Tribunal clarified that no duty was applicable to grey fabric and emphasized the prospective application of statutory provisions, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>