<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 600 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112927</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, dismissed the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s order to deposit a specified duty amount within a set timeframe. Despite a rejected request for modification and an extension granted, the appellants failed to deposit any amount within the stipulated time. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of steps taken by the appellants to comply, noting their intention to file a writ petition without actually doing so. Citing precedent, the Tribunal highlighted that no review application could be entertained without a prima facie case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the Customs Act and the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:29:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 600 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112927</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, dismissed the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s order to deposit a specified duty amount within a set timeframe. Despite a rejected request for modification and an extension granted, the appellants failed to deposit any amount within the stipulated time. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of steps taken by the appellants to comply, noting their intention to file a writ petition without actually doing so. Citing precedent, the Tribunal highlighted that no review application could be entertained without a prima facie case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the Customs Act and the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>