<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 591 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order with modifications, reducing the penalty amount to Rs. 50,000 but leaving the redemption fine unchanged. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, authorizing the Department to recover the penalty and redemption fine from the security furnished by the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:05:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 591 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order with modifications, reducing the penalty amount to Rs. 50,000 but leaving the redemption fine unchanged. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, authorizing the Department to recover the penalty and redemption fine from the security furnished by the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>