<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 574 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112906</link>
    <description>An amount required to be debited under a credit reversal provision is not recoverable as duty or Modvat credit where the Act or Rules contain no express machinery for recovery. The Tribunal applied its earlier ruling and held that, even if the department had computed the amount on an incorrect price base, the legal character of the debit did not change. Recovery, interest and penalty were therefore not sustainable, and the departmental order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:41:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 574 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112906</link>
      <description>An amount required to be debited under a credit reversal provision is not recoverable as duty or Modvat credit where the Act or Rules contain no express machinery for recovery. The Tribunal applied its earlier ruling and held that, even if the department had computed the amount on an incorrect price base, the legal character of the debit did not change. Recovery, interest and penalty were therefore not sustainable, and the departmental order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>