<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 557 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112889</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by Revenue against the assessee for duty payment evasion and suppression of facts was dismissed. The Commissioner found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the demand was time-barred as the Department was aware of the transactions. Since the Revenue did not challenge the issue of limitation, the appeal was deemed unsustainable, resulting in its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 557 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112889</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by Revenue against the assessee for duty payment evasion and suppression of facts was dismissed. The Commissioner found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the demand was time-barred as the Department was aware of the transactions. Since the Revenue did not challenge the issue of limitation, the appeal was deemed unsustainable, resulting in its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>