<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 548 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112880</link>
    <description>Duty could not be demanded on returned flow meters sent for repair where the original clearance records, invoices and serial numbers could identify the goods as the same items earlier cleared. The Revenue could not reject the assessee&#039;s claim merely because a departmental verification report was absent, when no evidence showed that the returned goods were different or that the repair activity amounted to manufacture of fresh goods. Prior Tribunal authority on returned goods supported this approach, and the assessee&#039;s claim was accepted with the demand held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 548 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112880</link>
      <description>Duty could not be demanded on returned flow meters sent for repair where the original clearance records, invoices and serial numbers could identify the goods as the same items earlier cleared. The Revenue could not reject the assessee&#039;s claim merely because a departmental verification report was absent, when no evidence showed that the returned goods were different or that the repair activity amounted to manufacture of fresh goods. Prior Tribunal authority on returned goods supported this approach, and the assessee&#039;s claim was accepted with the demand held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>