<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 543 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112875</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not be taken beyond the prescribed six-month period from the invoice date. Where credit was availed on invoices dated 31-1-99 for a period ending 30-9-99, the delay fell outside the statutory limit and the credit was barred. Financial shortage was not a legal basis to disregard the mandatory time restriction. The credit was therefore correctly disallowed, and the appellate challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 543 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112875</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not be taken beyond the prescribed six-month period from the invoice date. Where credit was availed on invoices dated 31-1-99 for a period ending 30-9-99, the delay fell outside the statutory limit and the credit was barred. Financial shortage was not a legal basis to disregard the mandatory time restriction. The credit was therefore correctly disallowed, and the appellate challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>