<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 566 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112874</link>
    <description>Unexplained shortage of finished goods already reflected in statutory production records can support a finding of clandestine removal when physical verification shows missing stock and no satisfactory explanation is offered; the duty demand and related penalty are sustained on that basis. Modvat credit on scrap purchased from a ship-breaker is not admissible where the invoices are unsupported by proof of payment of the purchase price, because mere invoicing or movement of goods is insufficient for credit entitlement; denial of credit is upheld. Where clandestine removal is established from the stock shortage, penalty follows, and the appeals fail in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:03:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 566 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112874</link>
      <description>Unexplained shortage of finished goods already reflected in statutory production records can support a finding of clandestine removal when physical verification shows missing stock and no satisfactory explanation is offered; the duty demand and related penalty are sustained on that basis. Modvat credit on scrap purchased from a ship-breaker is not admissible where the invoices are unsupported by proof of payment of the purchase price, because mere invoicing or movement of goods is insufficient for credit entitlement; denial of credit is upheld. Where clandestine removal is established from the stock shortage, penalty follows, and the appeals fail in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>