https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112872 The Tribunal rejected the appellants' requests for condonation of delay in filing appeals ranging from 6 to 62 days. Despite claiming the delay was due to the Consultant misplacing appeal papers, the appellants failed to demonstrate proactive measures to ensure timely filing. The Tribunal emphasized the appellants' responsibility to oversee the filing process and found no valid excuse for the delays. As a result, the condonation requests were denied, leading to the dismissal of stay petitions and all appeals filed by the appellants. en-us Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 May 2012 12:59:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112872 The Tribunal rejected the appellants' requests for condonation of delay in filing appeals ranging from 6 to 62 days. Despite claiming the delay was due to the Consultant misplacing appeal papers, the appellants failed to demonstrate proactive measures to ensure timely filing. The Tribunal emphasized the appellants' responsibility to oversee the filing process and found no valid excuse for the delays. As a result, the condonation requests were denied, leading to the dismissal of stay petitions and all appeals filed by the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112872