https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112870 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of M/s. Overland Agencies in a case involving the suspension of their Customs House Agent (CHA) license. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Customs' cross-objections were unnecessary as the previous appeal had already favored M/s. Overland Agencies, rendering the Commissioner's objections moot. The Tribunal criticized the routine filing of objections by the revenue when not legally required and emphasized that objections should only be filed if a specific portion of the order is against the revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Commissioner's cross-objections as lacking legal merit. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 May 2012 12:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112870 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of M/s. Overland Agencies in a case involving the suspension of their Customs House Agent (CHA) license. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Customs' cross-objections were unnecessary as the previous appeal had already favored M/s. Overland Agencies, rendering the Commissioner's objections moot. The Tribunal criticized the routine filing of objections by the revenue when not legally required and emphasized that objections should only be filed if a specific portion of the order is against the revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Commissioner's cross-objections as lacking legal merit. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112870