https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112847 SAFEMA requires service of notice on the person in whose name the property stands when that person is alleged to hold it for the detenue, and Section 7(1) requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing before any finding of illegal acquisition and forfeiture. Where the property stood in the petitioner's name, but no notice under Section 6(2) and no hearing under Section 7(1) were given, the mandatory statutory safeguards and natural justice requirements were not met. On that basis, the forfeiture of the petitioner's property could not be sustained and was set aside insofar as it concerned her property. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 May 2012 11:11:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112847 SAFEMA requires service of notice on the person in whose name the property stands when that person is alleged to hold it for the detenue, and Section 7(1) requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing before any finding of illegal acquisition and forfeiture. Where the property stood in the petitioner's name, but no notice under Section 6(2) and no hearing under Section 7(1) were given, the mandatory statutory safeguards and natural justice requirements were not met. On that basis, the forfeiture of the petitioner's property could not be sustained and was set aside insofar as it concerned her property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112847