<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 509 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112842</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding duty exemption on goods cleared in August 1997. The Tribunal held that the original Notification No. 50/97 provided exemption for goods cleared in August, and subsequent amendments did not affect this exemption. Therefore, the duty demand based on the Tariff rate was deemed invalid, and the appeals were dismissed. The judgment underscored the necessity of precise interpretation of legal provisions to ascertain duty liability on goods cleared during specified periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 509 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112842</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding duty exemption on goods cleared in August 1997. The Tribunal held that the original Notification No. 50/97 provided exemption for goods cleared in August, and subsequent amendments did not affect this exemption. Therefore, the duty demand based on the Tariff rate was deemed invalid, and the appeals were dismissed. The judgment underscored the necessity of precise interpretation of legal provisions to ascertain duty liability on goods cleared during specified periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>