https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112836 Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was declined because the loading charges issue was only arguable, the limitation plea was left open for final adjudication, and no financial hardship was shown. The first appellant was therefore required to deposit part of the duty demand, after which stay was granted for the balance duty and the entire penalty. The second appellant obtained unconditional stay. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2012 19:00:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112836 Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was declined because the loading charges issue was only arguable, the limitation plea was left open for final adjudication, and no financial hardship was shown. The first appellant was therefore required to deposit part of the duty demand, after which stay was granted for the balance duty and the entire penalty. The second appellant obtained unconditional stay. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112836