<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 578 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112834</link>
    <description>In a prosecution for an offence punishable with fine only, the six-month limitation period under section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applied. The attempt to exclude time spent in obtaining prior sanction under section 470(3) failed because the complaint did not plead the date on which sanction was sought, making the excluded period incapable of computation with certainty. The document states that, on this basis, cognizance could not be validly taken and the limitation objection was not cured by the sanction-time plea.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 578 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112834</link>
      <description>In a prosecution for an offence punishable with fine only, the six-month limitation period under section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applied. The attempt to exclude time spent in obtaining prior sanction under section 470(3) failed because the complaint did not plead the date on which sanction was sought, making the excluded period incapable of computation with certainty. The document states that, on this basis, cognizance could not be validly taken and the limitation objection was not cured by the sanction-time plea.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>