<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 501 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112831</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. Confiscation of currency, gold biscuit, and cars, along with the penalty, was deemed unsustainable due to insufficient evidence and procedural lapses. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant appropriate relief under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 501 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112831</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. Confiscation of currency, gold biscuit, and cars, along with the penalty, was deemed unsustainable due to insufficient evidence and procedural lapses. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellant appropriate relief under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>