<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 570 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112821</link>
    <description>Criminal complaints under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were quashed because the prosecution had remained pending for about 22 years without framing of charge, involving only a small amount of foreign exchange and no meaningful progress. The HC noted that the Act itself linked punishment to the value involved, showing that the gravity of the offence depended on the amount in question. It held that the unexplained delay, advanced age of the petitioners, and the resulting denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Articles 14 and 21 made continuation of the proceedings unjustified, and all consequential proceedings were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 570 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112821</link>
      <description>Criminal complaints under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were quashed because the prosecution had remained pending for about 22 years without framing of charge, involving only a small amount of foreign exchange and no meaningful progress. The HC noted that the Act itself linked punishment to the value involved, showing that the gravity of the offence depended on the amount in question. It held that the unexplained delay, advanced age of the petitioners, and the resulting denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Articles 14 and 21 made continuation of the proceedings unjustified, and all consequential proceedings were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>