<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 567 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112817</link>
    <description>An employee whose termination had been finally set aside as illegal was entitled to salary arrears for the period before the company&#039;s winding up. Because the salary claim related to a pre-winding-up period and had already been allowed in computation proceedings under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, it did not become a post-liquidation debt subject to the priority scheme under the Companies Act, 1956. The employee was therefore to be treated on par with similarly situated workmen, and the arrears up to 31-10-1994 remained payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 567 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112817</link>
      <description>An employee whose termination had been finally set aside as illegal was entitled to salary arrears for the period before the company&#039;s winding up. Because the salary claim related to a pre-winding-up period and had already been allowed in computation proceedings under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, it did not become a post-liquidation debt subject to the priority scheme under the Companies Act, 1956. The employee was therefore to be treated on par with similarly situated workmen, and the arrears up to 31-10-1994 remained payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>