https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112815 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order for failure to deposit duty. The duty demanded on Modvat credit and yarn, totaling Rs. 42.87 lakhs, was contested. The Tribunal highlighted confusion over Rule 57C's applicability, favoring the appellant's position based on past decisions. The appeal also challenged duty on burnt yarn under Rule 49(A), emphasizing a pending remission application. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner for reassessment without requiring a deposit, ensuring a fair review considering the pending remission application and unresolved duty issues. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2012 18:29:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112815 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order for failure to deposit duty. The duty demanded on Modvat credit and yarn, totaling Rs. 42.87 lakhs, was contested. The Tribunal highlighted confusion over Rule 57C's applicability, favoring the appellant's position based on past decisions. The appeal also challenged duty on burnt yarn under Rule 49(A), emphasizing a pending remission application. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner for reassessment without requiring a deposit, ensuring a fair review considering the pending remission application and unresolved duty issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112815