<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 469 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112811</link>
    <description>The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff regarding the unfair postponement of the poll and the conduct of the meeting, leading to the resolution being passed. The court set aside the Trial Court&#039;s judgment, continued the injunction preventing the company from implementing the resolution, and dismissed the appeal filed by Teji Mandi, upholding the Trial Court&#039;s order in that regard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 469 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112811</link>
      <description>The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff regarding the unfair postponement of the poll and the conduct of the meeting, leading to the resolution being passed. The court set aside the Trial Court&#039;s judgment, continued the injunction preventing the company from implementing the resolution, and dismissed the appeal filed by Teji Mandi, upholding the Trial Court&#039;s order in that regard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>