https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112788 The court set aside the judgment and decree, remanding the suit for retrial. The respondent was allowed to present additional evidence, and the appellant was directed to provide details of recorded holders. Both parties were given the chance to adduce further evidence. The court prohibited the appellant from recording transfers or rectifying the share register regarding disputed shares until the suit's resolution. The court urged prompt disposal of the matter, preferably within six months. Justice Prasenjit Mandal concurred with the decision. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112788 The court set aside the judgment and decree, remanding the suit for retrial. The respondent was allowed to present additional evidence, and the appellant was directed to provide details of recorded holders. Both parties were given the chance to adduce further evidence. The court prohibited the appellant from recording transfers or rectifying the share register regarding disputed shares until the suit's resolution. The court urged prompt disposal of the matter, preferably within six months. Justice Prasenjit Mandal concurred with the decision. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112788