https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112787 The Court held in favor of the applicant, directing the Registrar of Companies to approve the proposed company name as part of a scheme of amalgamation. The Judge emphasized the mandatory nature of giving notice to the Central Government under the Companies Act and noted that objections to the name change should have been raised earlier in the process. Since no objections were raised during the petition consideration stage, the Registrar was bound to comply with the Court's order sanctioning the scheme, including the name change provision. The Registrar's refusal to record the name change was deemed unjustified, and the name change was directed to be recorded within two weeks. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112787 The Court held in favor of the applicant, directing the Registrar of Companies to approve the proposed company name as part of a scheme of amalgamation. The Judge emphasized the mandatory nature of giving notice to the Central Government under the Companies Act and noted that objections to the name change should have been raised earlier in the process. Since no objections were raised during the petition consideration stage, the Registrar was bound to comply with the Court's order sanctioning the scheme, including the name change provision. The Registrar's refusal to record the name change was deemed unjustified, and the name change was directed to be recorded within two weeks. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112787