<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 458 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112785</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower courts and the Company Law Board regarding the legality of share allotment, appointment of directors, and distribution of assets. The Court found that the appellants were likely aware of the share allotment, leading to no interference under Article 136 of the Constitution. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 458 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112785</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower courts and the Company Law Board regarding the legality of share allotment, appointment of directors, and distribution of assets. The Court found that the appellants were likely aware of the share allotment, leading to no interference under Article 136 of the Constitution. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>