https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112783 The appellant failed to comply with a deposit order of Rs. 10 lakhs within six weeks, leading to the dismissal of their appeal against a stay order. The High Court upheld the deposit requirement, emphasizing that financial losses do not justify reducing the amount. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as filing it did not automatically stay the original order, and without compliance or a stay order from the Division Bench, the appeal was deemed unjustified. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2012 17:19:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112783 The appellant failed to comply with a deposit order of Rs. 10 lakhs within six weeks, leading to the dismissal of their appeal against a stay order. The High Court upheld the deposit requirement, emphasizing that financial losses do not justify reducing the amount. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as filing it did not automatically stay the original order, and without compliance or a stay order from the Division Bench, the appeal was deemed unjustified. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112783