<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 489 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112775</link>
    <description>Vicarious liability under the SEBI Act cannot be invoked against a director unless the complaint contains specific averments showing that the person was in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the company&#039;s business. General statements that directors collectively managed affairs are insufficient, and criminal process cannot issue merely because a person holds the title of director. As the complaint did not disclose the petitioner&#039;s individual role, participation, consent, connivance, or neglect, and the record suggested she was only a subscriber, the complaint and summoning order were unsustainable against her and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 489 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112775</link>
      <description>Vicarious liability under the SEBI Act cannot be invoked against a director unless the complaint contains specific averments showing that the person was in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the company&#039;s business. General statements that directors collectively managed affairs are insufficient, and criminal process cannot issue merely because a person holds the title of director. As the complaint did not disclose the petitioner&#039;s individual role, participation, consent, connivance, or neglect, and the record suggested she was only a subscriber, the complaint and summoning order were unsustainable against her and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>