<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 481 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112763</link>
    <description>The court addressed an application for the revival of a company under sections 529A and 546 of the Companies Act, 1956, filed by the Employees Union. Various procedural infirmities in the bid process for the company&#039;s assets were examined, with concerns raised by multiple bidders regarding irregularities affecting their participation. The dispute over the factory premises in Kolkata, the validity of the bidding process, allegations of impropriety, and the creation of vested rights in favor of the auction purchaser were key issues. The court emphasized the importance of efficient resolution, upheld the rights of the successful auction purchaser, and dismissed appeals seeking to prolong litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 481 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112763</link>
      <description>The court addressed an application for the revival of a company under sections 529A and 546 of the Companies Act, 1956, filed by the Employees Union. Various procedural infirmities in the bid process for the company&#039;s assets were examined, with concerns raised by multiple bidders regarding irregularities affecting their participation. The dispute over the factory premises in Kolkata, the validity of the bidding process, allegations of impropriety, and the creation of vested rights in favor of the auction purchaser were key issues. The court emphasized the importance of efficient resolution, upheld the rights of the successful auction purchaser, and dismissed appeals seeking to prolong litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>