<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112720</link>
    <description>At the stage of a summons for directions under section 391(1) of the Companies Act, the Company Court proceeds ex parte under Rule 67, subject to Rule 68 where applicable. The court need only form a prima facie view on the genuineness and bona fides of the proposed amalgamation scheme and confirm compliance with the procedural requirements for convening a meeting. Hearing creditors, members and shareholders is reserved for the later notice-and-meeting stage under Rules 73, 74 and 76. The distinction between the preliminary direction stage and the subsequent meeting stage is essential to the workable operation of the scheme provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112720</link>
      <description>At the stage of a summons for directions under section 391(1) of the Companies Act, the Company Court proceeds ex parte under Rule 67, subject to Rule 68 where applicable. The court need only form a prima facie view on the genuineness and bona fides of the proposed amalgamation scheme and confirm compliance with the procedural requirements for convening a meeting. Hearing creditors, members and shareholders is reserved for the later notice-and-meeting stage under Rules 73, 74 and 76. The distinction between the preliminary direction stage and the subsequent meeting stage is essential to the workable operation of the scheme provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>