<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 400 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112703</link>
    <description>The court acknowledged previous winding up orders against the respondent company and directed the petitioner to lodge their claim with the Official Liquidator in the pending winding up proceedings. An order was passed to invite claims from creditors of the company, ensuring a fair process. The petitioner&#039;s concerns regarding the conduct of the respondent and its ex-directors were noted, allowing submission of detailed instances of alleged false statements for further scrutiny. The judgment clarified that the order did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner&#039;s claim, instructing parties to receive a copy for reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 13:35:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 400 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112703</link>
      <description>The court acknowledged previous winding up orders against the respondent company and directed the petitioner to lodge their claim with the Official Liquidator in the pending winding up proceedings. An order was passed to invite claims from creditors of the company, ensuring a fair process. The petitioner&#039;s concerns regarding the conduct of the respondent and its ex-directors were noted, allowing submission of detailed instances of alleged false statements for further scrutiny. The judgment clarified that the order did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner&#039;s claim, instructing parties to receive a copy for reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>