<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 354 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112683</link>
    <description>The court granted the prayers for amalgamation of three transferor-companies with a transferee-company under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Despite objections raised by a party regarding property transfer, the court found in favor of the petitioner companies, stating compliance with all requirements and dismissing objections as irrelevant. The court emphasized the amalgamation&#039;s benefits for companies, members, and creditors, ensuring the objector&#039;s rights in pending proceedings would not be affected. The petitions were disposed of, with costs directed to be paid to the Central Government counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 354 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112683</link>
      <description>The court granted the prayers for amalgamation of three transferor-companies with a transferee-company under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Despite objections raised by a party regarding property transfer, the court found in favor of the petitioner companies, stating compliance with all requirements and dismissing objections as irrelevant. The court emphasized the amalgamation&#039;s benefits for companies, members, and creditors, ensuring the objector&#039;s rights in pending proceedings would not be affected. The petitions were disposed of, with costs directed to be paid to the Central Government counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>