<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 355 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, comprising Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri V.K. Agrawal, stayed the recovery of Central Excise duty and penalty for M/s. Bajrang Wire Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. during the appeal process, finding that the appellant made a strong prima facie case and was not liable to pay the duty. The case was set for regular hearing on 30-12-2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:08:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 355 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, comprising Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri V.K. Agrawal, stayed the recovery of Central Excise duty and penalty for M/s. Bajrang Wire Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. during the appeal process, finding that the appellant made a strong prima facie case and was not liable to pay the duty. The case was set for regular hearing on 30-12-2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>