<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 560 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112658</link>
    <description>The Court reinstated the original sale order in favor of the appellant, rejecting the legality of allowing a higher bid after sale confirmation. Emphasizing the adequacy of the appellant&#039;s bid, more than double the valuation and highest offer, the Court upheld the sanctity of confirmed sales. Scrutinizing the conduct of the parties, the Court found respondent No. 1 lacking in bona fides and restored the original sale order, directing the Official Liquidator to complete the sale formalities for the appellant within two weeks. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded, and the stay request was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 560 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112658</link>
      <description>The Court reinstated the original sale order in favor of the appellant, rejecting the legality of allowing a higher bid after sale confirmation. Emphasizing the adequacy of the appellant&#039;s bid, more than double the valuation and highest offer, the Court upheld the sanctity of confirmed sales. Scrutinizing the conduct of the parties, the Court found respondent No. 1 lacking in bona fides and restored the original sale order, directing the Official Liquidator to complete the sale formalities for the appellant within two weeks. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded, and the stay request was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>