<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 566 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112648</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was confined to protecting implementation of a rehabilitation scheme and preventing recovery action only where the debt formed part of, or would interfere with, that scheme. Fresh liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business after registration of the BIFR reference were treated as independent post-reference transactions outside the statutory bar. The absence of a framed scheme did not expand section 22 to cover unpaid price claims for such later supplies. The winding-up petition for recovery of the post-reference debt was therefore maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 566 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112648</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was confined to protecting implementation of a rehabilitation scheme and preventing recovery action only where the debt formed part of, or would interfere with, that scheme. Fresh liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business after registration of the BIFR reference were treated as independent post-reference transactions outside the statutory bar. The absence of a framed scheme did not expand section 22 to cover unpaid price claims for such later supplies. The winding-up petition for recovery of the post-reference debt was therefore maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>