<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 522 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112646</link>
    <description>The court declared the order striking off the company&#039;s name as non est, illegal, and void ab initio. The company&#039;s name was ordered to be restored to the Register of Companies as if it had never been struck off. The judgment emphasized the significance of procedural compliance and adherence to statutory requirements in matters of striking off company names from the register under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 522 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112646</link>
      <description>The court declared the order striking off the company&#039;s name as non est, illegal, and void ab initio. The company&#039;s name was ordered to be restored to the Register of Companies as if it had never been struck off. The judgment emphasized the significance of procedural compliance and adherence to statutory requirements in matters of striking off company names from the register under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>