https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112631 Special Court jurisdiction extended to offences arising from securities transactions and to persons involved as principal offenders, conspirators or abettors. On the evidence, coordinated banking entries and voucher movements supported findings of criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of trust against responsible officers and the beneficiary, subject to benefit of doubt on specific transactions. The forgery-based convictions were unsustainable because the documents did not satisfy the statutory ingredients of making a false document, and mere irregular or premature preparation of vouchers was insufficient. The appellant was given benefit of doubt and acquitted for lack of conclusive proof of his participation. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112631 Special Court jurisdiction extended to offences arising from securities transactions and to persons involved as principal offenders, conspirators or abettors. On the evidence, coordinated banking entries and voucher movements supported findings of criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of trust against responsible officers and the beneficiary, subject to benefit of doubt on specific transactions. The forgery-based convictions were unsustainable because the documents did not satisfy the statutory ingredients of making a false document, and mere irregular or premature preparation of vouchers was insufficient. The appellant was given benefit of doubt and acquitted for lack of conclusive proof of his participation. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112631