<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 777 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112618</link>
    <description>A winding up petition cannot proceed where the debt is genuinely disputed and the respondent shows a bona fide, substantial counter-claim supported by prima facie material. In summary winding up jurisdiction, the Company Court may only assess whether the defence is in good faith and of substance; it cannot undertake detailed fact-finding, quantify disputed counter-claims, or finally adjudicate rival claims that require civil trial. An objection to the supporting affidavit, being a defect in form and not in substance, was treated as a curable irregularity. The winding up order was recalled and the parties were left to pursue ordinary civil remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 777 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112618</link>
      <description>A winding up petition cannot proceed where the debt is genuinely disputed and the respondent shows a bona fide, substantial counter-claim supported by prima facie material. In summary winding up jurisdiction, the Company Court may only assess whether the defence is in good faith and of substance; it cannot undertake detailed fact-finding, quantify disputed counter-claims, or finally adjudicate rival claims that require civil trial. An objection to the supporting affidavit, being a defect in form and not in substance, was treated as a curable irregularity. The winding up order was recalled and the parties were left to pursue ordinary civil remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>