<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 419 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112617</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Central Excise Rules was reduced where the goods were duly accounted for against cash payments, the related Modvat credit had lapsed, and no revenue loss was shown. On those facts, the penalty initially imposed was considered exorbitant and not commensurate with the established default. The penalty was therefore reduced to Rs. 10,000, while the remainder of the order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 419 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112617</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Central Excise Rules was reduced where the goods were duly accounted for against cash payments, the related Modvat credit had lapsed, and no revenue loss was shown. On those facts, the penalty initially imposed was considered exorbitant and not commensurate with the established default. The penalty was therefore reduced to Rs. 10,000, while the remainder of the order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>