https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112613 The court dismissed the appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, as it was filed beyond the permissible period of 120 days, making it barred by limitation. The applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal, which was attributed to pursuing the remedy in a court lacking jurisdiction. The court held that the Companies Act, being a special law, excludes the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning delays beyond the prescribed period. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, and the appeal was also dismissed without costs. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112613 The court dismissed the appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, as it was filed beyond the permissible period of 120 days, making it barred by limitation. The applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal, which was attributed to pursuing the remedy in a court lacking jurisdiction. The court held that the Companies Act, being a special law, excludes the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning delays beyond the prescribed period. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, and the appeal was also dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112613