<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 771 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112609</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Company Law Board&#039;s findings that there was no violation of Article 37, no act of oppression, and no substantiated claim of mismanagement. The appellant was not compelled to sell shares and could continue as a shareholder.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 771 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112609</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Company Law Board&#039;s findings that there was no violation of Article 37, no act of oppression, and no substantiated claim of mismanagement. The appellant was not compelled to sell shares and could continue as a shareholder.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>