<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 482 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties of Rs. 70,000 imposed on M/s. Bundelkhand Alloys (P) Ltd., Shri Dheer Singh, and Shri Saurav Jain for alleged duty evasion. The Tribunal found that the confiscated goods were not cleared with duty payment as claimed, based on evidence indicating the documents were prepared post-seizure to conceal evasion. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 482 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties of Rs. 70,000 imposed on M/s. Bundelkhand Alloys (P) Ltd., Shri Dheer Singh, and Shri Saurav Jain for alleged duty evasion. The Tribunal found that the confiscated goods were not cleared with duty payment as claimed, based on evidence indicating the documents were prepared post-seizure to conceal evasion. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>